To the editor:

In order to maintain order within a society, there is a need for laws written and implied. As soon a humankind began forming into groups greater than just the individual, there have been some form of implied ritual of respect of how to conduct relationships.

Three thousand years ago, Hammurabi was the first to codify into written law 282 rules of established standards for the interactions of society. From that time on, all civil societies have maintained some common standards of conduct for all people. From the time of cavemen, all people from Asia to western society have some laws. All these laws have one common denominator. That of an eventual answer and judgment by some greater authority above humankind.

Thus, the foundation of religious authority over human behavior. The framers of the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution acknowledged this in these documents.

As I observe the beginning of a new year, I see and hear people raising concerns on subjects dear to them. Again, religious belief is given as the need or justification for law and regulations. Those opposing the implementation of these regulations cry out to keep religion out of laws. It is important here to note that the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion in all aspects of life. It clearly states freedom of, not freedom from, religion. This prevents any religious group from imposing their concept of deity on the rest of the society.

As we consider new or additional laws regarding relationships between two adults, we need clear understanding of what is considered life in relation to abortion, respect for individual such as racial interaction or immigration or racial superiority of one over the other or the relationship of consenting adults. It is important we cannot codify human emotions and prejudices so we need allow for different concepts of what might be a considered righteous moral standard when interpreting laws.

At what point do we rely on personal understanding of right and wrong? So long as words or actions don’t physically affect another person, they should not be restricted or prohibited. Spoken words though often hurtful and offensive should not be regulated unless they lead directly or indirectly to physical action against another.

Let’s begin the New Year resolving supporting our neighbors with peace and love rather than anger, prejudice and hate.

Together, we can make a difference in America.

William Gerhard, Scipio